#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad update#
#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad software#
#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad free#
#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad windows#

Sales of Fusion to existing Inventor customers are poor Autodesk admits 90% of Fusion users are new to the company. Fusion files are not compatible with Inventor, or Vault even, with users reduced to exporting non-associative STEP files from Fusion. Fusion lacks some of the basics that mechanical designers expect from MCAD systems, although it is admired for its HSM CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing) component.

#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad windows#

Even though Autodesk touts it as a вЂњcloud-based platform,вЂќ Fusion runs on MacOS and Windows desktop computers with some links to AutodeskвЂ™s proprietary cloud.

The designated replacement for Inventor is Fusion 360вЂ¦eventually. In other words, weвЂ™ll never see an Inventor 360.

#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad software#

Ultimately, Autodesk wants all its software running on the cloud, but Inventor is tied so tightly to MicrosoftвЂ™s proprietary codebase that porting it to another computing environment is neigh impossible. Analysts estimate that Inventor sold 24,000 seats last year and Solidworks 70,000 seats.ДЇlash forward nearly a decade and now Inventor needs to be killed off, just as MDT was. We donвЂ™t really know, as CAD vendors no longer report exact seat numbers. Today, analysts believe Inventor might be in second or third place after Solidworks and Solid Edge, maybe.

Ultimately, the three-pronged Rubicon tactic failed.

(Autodesk lost the orange rectangle lawsuit, and Dassault negotiated a settlement over DWGEditor.)

#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad free#

an orange rectangle) and the use of DWG in its free 2D utility, DWGEditor. Autodesk next targeted Solidworks Corp (and parent Dassault Systemes) with lawsuits contesting its use of similar trademark design (i.e. For those first few years, InventorвЂ™s marketing staff maintained a presence outside Solidworks World user events вЂ“ displaying ads on nearby billboards, handing out boxing-motif leaflets and inviting Solidworks users to Inventor social events.

#Autodesk fusion 360 vs autocad update#

The launch was followed by an aggressive twice-yearly update schedule designed to bring InventorвЂ™s feature set in line with SolidworksвЂ™.ДЄt the same time, Autodesk undertook a similarly aggressive anti-Solidworks campaign of in-their-face marketing and lawsuits. In the same way, Autodesk committed to challenging SolidworksвЂ™ dominance of the mid-priced MCAD market by launching Project Rubicon (now known as Inventor) in 1999.

Since then, вЂњcrossing the RubiconвЂќ has become an idiom for committing to a course of action past the point of no return. It was made famous when Julius Caesar, and the army he led, crossed it in 49BC, and thereby broke Roman law and irrevocably began a civil war that led to him becoming dictator of the empire.ДЇigure 1: Defining the length of partial fillets in Inventor 2018 The word Rubicon refers the shallow river that, in Ancient Rome, marked the northern border of Italy proper. So, instead, it launched вЂњProject RubiconвЂќ вЂ“ a new MCAD system written from scratch. To compete with the Solidworks juggernaut, Autodesk first tried buying them, but lost to Dassault Systemes. The AutoCAD engine lacked MCAD necessities like constraints and assemblies and, in any case, it made MDT a hard sell to non-AutoCAD users. To this day, it remains such.ДЄt the time, Autodesk offered two AutoCAD-based packages to MCAD designers вЂ“ Mechanical Desktop (MDT) for 3D modeling and AutoCAD Mechanical for 2D detailing. Self-funded by its programmers, this brand-new, mid-priced (roughly $5,000) parametric MCAD program seemed to вЂњcome out of nowhere.вЂќ In a couple of years, Solidworks had become the best selling Windows-based MCAD program, undercutting the high-end ($10,000+) market of Pro/Engineer, UGS and Catia. Autodesk began work on Inventor as a reaction to the run-away success of Solidworks.